Code review companies, products & suppliers

Bots that comment on diffs and pull requests rather than writing the first draft. Jobs: pr comments; style and defect hints on diffs; reviewer workload routing.

What is Code review?

Bots that comment on diffs and pull requests rather than writing the first draft. Jobs: pr comments; style and defect hints on diffs; reviewer workload routing.

What problems does it solve?

Reviewers spend time on nits while substantive defects still ship.

Typical business use cases

  • PR comments
  • Style and defect hints on diffs
  • Reviewer workload routing

Important capabilities

  • SCM integration
  • Diff context
  • Policy packs

What buyers should evaluate

  • False-positive rate
  • Where diffs are sent
  • Override process

Risks and governance considerations

A bot that blocks merges on noisy findings or leaks private diffs.

Procurement checklist

  • SCM permissions
  • Finding export
  • Human override

Relevant AI Trustmark assurance

AI Trustmark independent findings appear only when an assessment or certificate exists. Category membership does not imply verification.

Methodology · How verification works

Products and providers

Open a product profile for its catalogue details, or use the provider link for the company profile. Claimed listings appear first, then by name. Payment never changes the order.

  • By Bito

    Bito's AI Code Review Agent reviews every pull request with full system context from its AI Architect engine, which draws on code, commits, issues, docs and Slack discussions. It f

  • By Codacy

    Codacy Quality is a code quality platform for AI-assisted engineering teams. It applies AI Guardrails inside coding agents and IDEs to review and auto-fix generated code as it is w

  • By CodeRabbit

    CodeRabbit is an AI code review and change management platform for teams shipping AI-generated code. It automatically reviews every pull request on GitHub and GitLab with committab

  • By DeepSource

    DeepSource is DeepSource's software product, from DeepSource Corp. Published at deepsource.com. Directory filing: Code review. Vendor legal name on this product record: DeepSource

  • By Ellipsis

    Managed Claude Code agents in the cloud. Define agents as config files in your repo – Ellipsis runs them to review PRs, build features, and investigate production issues. Ellipsis

  • By GitHub

    GitHub, a Microsoft company, sells Git hosting, Actions CI and Copilot AI coding assistance. Public pages cover cloud repositories and developer tools. GitHub Copilot Code Review i

  • By Graphite

    Graphite helps teams on GitHub deliver higher quality software, faster. Graphite Diamond is Graphite's software product, from Graphite Solutions, Inc. Published at graphite.com/dia

  • By Greptile

    AI Code Reviews that understand your entire codebase. Automate PR reviews, catch bugs faster, improve code quality with AI-driven analysis. Try Greptile free. Greptile is Greptile'

  • By Qodo

    Qodo is an agentic code review and integrity platform for improving code quality at every stage. Qodo Merge is Qodo's software product, from Codium Ltd. Published at qodo.ai/former

  • By Snyk

    Every AI-building team faces one question: can you trust what you're shipping? Snyk secures the code AI writes, the agents it runs, and the apps it builds. Get started for fre

  • By Sourcery

    Sourcery AI Limited publishes Sourcery, a Python refactoring and GitHub pull-request review assistant that comments on diffs inside IDEs and CI. Public docs cover the GitHub app, C

Products

Claimed products appear first. Ranking packs and payment do not change this list.

Also used in this category

These products have a different primary category so they do not compete for the same ranking queries. They are listed here because buyers still encounter them in this job.

Related categories

Relevant procurement and assurance guides

Frequently asked questions

What is Code review?

Bots that comment on diffs and pull requests rather than writing the first draft. Jobs: pr comments; style and defect hints on diffs; reviewer workload routing.

What should not be listed as Code review?

Products whose buyer job is coding assistants inside the editor, AppSec scanners, or QA test generators. Those belong on their own category page so search queries are not split.

Has AI Trustmark independently assessed every Code review supplier?

No. A category listing is descriptive. Independent assessment is shown only on company or product pages that carry Trustmark evidence.

Should coding assistants be allowed to send private source code to third-party models?

That is a buyer policy decision. Procurement should require the default data-use terms, retention, whether snippets leave the organisation, and whether secrets are redacted. A listing under coding assistants does not mean code stays on-premises.

How should prompt injection and tool-output attacks be controlled?

Agents that read untrusted content or tool output can be instructed to exfiltrate data or take writes. Buyers should ask what is treated as untrusted, whether tool output can change the plan, and what tests were run. Scanner marketing is not the same as independent testing.

How can buyers tell whether customer data is used to train models?

Ask whether prompts, files, logs or outputs are used to train, fine-tune or evaluate models, including by subprocessors. Require the contractual default, any opt-out, and whether the setting can be changed silently. Treat marketing 'we do not train' claims as unverified until evidenced.

What model or provider changes should a buyer insist on being told about?

Material change usually includes a new model family, new region, new subprocessor, new write-capable tool, or a change that affects logging, privacy or human oversight. Those changes should trigger evidence refresh rather than a silent release.

How should buyers verify where AI customer data is processed?

Ask for the named processing locations, cloud regions and any subprocessors that see prompts, files or outputs. A directory listing is not evidence of residency. Independent assessment records the locations that were in scope on the assessment date.