AppSec assistants companies, products & suppliers

Security assistants for application code and findings, not general coding help. Jobs: vuln hints on diffs; fix suggestions; triage of scanner output.

What are AppSec assistants?

Security assistants for application code and findings, not general coding help. Jobs: vuln hints on diffs; fix suggestions; triage of scanner output.

What problems does it solve?

Security review cannot keep up with generated code volume.

Typical business use cases

  • Vuln hints on diffs
  • Fix suggestions
  • Triage of scanner output

Important capabilities

  • SAST/SCA context
  • SCM integration
  • Finding workflow

What buyers should evaluate

  • False positives
  • Where code is sent
  • Mapping to your CWE policy

Risks and governance considerations

Source sent to a third party under a coding-assistant contract.

Procurement checklist

  • Data-use
  • Finding ownership
  • Override

Relevant AI Trustmark assurance

AI Trustmark independent findings appear only when an assessment or certificate exists. Category membership does not imply verification.

Methodology · How verification works

Companies and providers

Claimed suppliers appear first so buyers can start with listings the company has taken ownership of. Payment does not buy this order.

  • Continuous, autonomous security that gets developers back to building. Aikido Security is used for AppSec assistants work. Aikido Security publishes product information at aikido.d

  • Checkmarx agentic application security software platform Combines Hybrid scanning, AI-powered agents, and unified risk intelligence across every attack surface. Checkmarx publishes

  • Cycode’s Agentic Development Security Platform unites security and development teams with actionable, code-to-runtime context to identify, prioritize, and fix the software risk tha

  • GitHub, a Microsoft company, sells Git hosting, Actions CI and Copilot AI coding assistance. Public pages cover cloud repositories and developer tools. GitHub publishes GitHub Copi

  • JetBrains AI Assistant adds AI chat, code completion, and agent features inside JetBrains IDEs. Public marketing also emphasises native integration across IntelliJ-family IDEs. It

  • OX Security publishes OX Security as a named AI product. OX Security is used for AppSec assistants work. OX Security publishes product information at ox.security. OX Security is gr

  • An extensible developer-friendly application security platform that scans source code to surface true and actionable security issues with AI-assisted SAST, SCA, and Secrets Detecti

  • Every AI-building team faces one question: can you trust what you're shipping? Snyk secures the code AI writes, the agents it runs, and the apps it builds. Get started for fre

  • Sonar is the independent AI code verification platform trusted by 7M+ developers & organizations to help build secure, reliable software with confidence. Sonar publishes SonarQube

  • Build and run secure software from code to cloud with Veracode. Veracode publishes Veracode Fix as named AI products. Veracode is used for AppSec assistants work. Veracode publishe

Products

Claimed products appear first. Ranking packs and payment do not change this list.

Related categories

Relevant procurement and assurance guides

Frequently asked questions

What is AppSec assistants?

Security assistants for application code and findings, not general coding help. Jobs: vuln hints on diffs; fix suggestions; triage of scanner output.

What should not be listed as AppSec assistants?

Products whose buyer job is code review nits, pentest services, or runtime LLM guardrails. Those belong on their own category page so search queries are not split.

Has AI Trustmark independently assessed every AppSec assistants supplier?

No. A category listing is descriptive. Independent assessment is shown only on company or product pages that carry Trustmark evidence.

What are AppSec assistants?

Security assistants for application code and findings, not general coding help. Jobs: vuln hints on diffs; fix suggestions; triage of scanner output.

Should coding assistants be allowed to send private source code to third-party models?

That is a buyer policy decision. Procurement should require the default data-use terms, retention, whether snippets leave the organisation, and whether secrets are redacted. A listing under coding assistants does not mean code stays on-premises.

How should prompt injection and tool-output attacks be controlled?

Agents that read untrusted content or tool output can be instructed to exfiltrate data or take writes. Buyers should ask what is treated as untrusted, whether tool output can change the plan, and what tests were run. Scanner marketing is not the same as independent testing.

How can buyers tell whether customer data is used to train models?

Ask whether prompts, files, logs or outputs are used to train, fine-tune or evaluate models, including by subprocessors. Require the contractual default, any opt-out, and whether the setting can be changed silently. Treat marketing 'we do not train' claims as unverified until evidenced.

What model or provider changes should a buyer insist on being told about?

Material change usually includes a new model family, new region, new subprocessor, new write-capable tool, or a change that affects logging, privacy or human oversight. Those changes should trigger evidence refresh rather than a silent release.